literature made available by foresight go to the Foresight home page
view more booklets / leaflets / articles
print this page
go back to the previous page

THE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF AGROCHEMICALS ON REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (BOOKLET)
A review from the Literature by Tuula E. Tuormaa for FORESIGHT,
the Association for the Promotion of Preconceptual Care.

Introduction
Since the early development of agricultural practices, people have always sought different ways to increase their crop yield. The early use of pesticides included a variety of substances, such as urine, lime, soap suds, vinegar, tobacco, and similar simple compounds. Agrochemical production began as a relatively simple process, based primarily on combinations of a few chemical substances such as copper, mercury salts, elemental sulphur, arsenic, and cyanide (1).

The development of highly complex, chemical methods of pest control started around World War II, with the introduction of the first synthetic organochlorine (OC) insecticides, which included DDT, lindane (HCH), aldrin and dieldrin. The thousands of different pesticides manufactured today fall roughly into the following chemical categories; organochlorines, halogenated hydrocarbons, carbamates, heterocyclic compounds, organophosphates, chlorinated phenoxy substances, amines and ureas, benzonitriles, phenolic compounds and pyrethroids. They consist of a mixture of active ingredients; designed to destroy the pests, together with many other chemical additives, such as solvents, combined into usable products.

The growth of the agrochemical industry since World War II has been enormous, and now covers the globe. It is estimated that the industry worldwide produces about 45-50,000 different pesticides based on about 600 active ingredients. In one year alone 23,504 tonnes of active ingredients were sold by UK pesticide manufacturers, which amounts to nearly 420g for a person in the UK population (2). The actual sales of pesticides by UK manufacturers increased from £30 million a year from the late 1940s to £150 million in the mid-1970s. In 1985, total sales of pesticides amounted to almost £900 million, of which approximately 60% was accounted for by export purposes (1-3). Pesticide manufacture is dominated by a few large chemical companies worldwide, including Ciba Geigy, Bayer and ICI. Many of these companies also have interests in other chemical productions, including the manufacture of pharmaceuticals (1,4).


Who Uses Pesticides?
The agricultural industry's use of pesticides amounts to approximately 83% of the whole pesticide manufacture (2). It utilizes pesticides in many ways. They are used during the crop growth as insecticides, herbicides and fungicides. It has been estimated that cereal crops receive approximately five to eight pesticide applications per growing season, while for high value crops, such as some vegetables and fruit, 10-15 applications are often the norm (5). After harvesting, during storage, most cereal, fruit and vegetable crops are dosed again with several pesticides to protect them from any storage diseases. This post-harvest application of pesticides is fairly crude, i.e. the so called 'bucket and shovel' method, when additional pesticides are mixed with freshly harvested products, which are then introduced into the storage container with the already treated product (1,2). Consequently, even though the actual harvest may have been relatively uncontaminated with pesticides, this casual form of post-harvest storage treatment can add a considerable amount of pesticide residues to the finished product. Thus, pesticide residue levels on stored products can accumulate, as well as vary considerably from patch to patch (6). Pesticides are also used during livestock production, when they are either applied as 'animal medicines' such as sheep dips, warblefly dressings, lice/mange treatments, or as other 'veterinary pesticides' for controlling flies and other insects in livestock houses (1,2)

Non-agricultural use of pesticides covers many areas. Local authorities use a great variety of pesticides in their parks, gardens, lawns, golf courses and similar recreation areas. British Rail contractors spray thousands of kilos of pesticides, largely atrazine and simazine, annually on to railways and their embankments. Herbicides and chemicals such as sodium chlorate, dichlorobenzil and diquat are applied around canals and various waterways to remove excessive weeds (1,2). Modern building practices primarily use lindane as an active ingredient in wood preservation treatments (7). The insecticide aldrin is used in the treatment of electric cables. Others are used at all stages of forest management (8). They are also used widely in domestic gardens. The most recent figures show that over the period 1982-1988, the sales in the garden herbicides increased by 20,9% and garden insecticides by 35,1% (3).

Pesticides are also present in many other manufactured products, including wall paper pastes, marine and anti-fouling paints, wooden furniture, DIY products and natural-fibre textiles. New carpets are often treated with moth proofing chemicals, including common insecticides such as pyrethrums and lindane. Insecticides such as carbaryl, lindane and malathion are also found in pet delousing products as well as in some shampoos for controlling human head lice and scabies. In human medicine, warfarin, the rodenticide, which has an anticoagulant action, is frequently used in the prevention of blood clots (1). Traces of lindane, dieldrin, DDT and chlorpyrifos have also been found in some lanolin samples (9,10). They had not been added to lanolin for any specific purpose, but as lanolin is derived from sheep wool fat, the pesticide contamination was attributed to the use of sheep dips.

As can be seen, the use of pesticides is extremely diverse. They are found in our foods, water, gardens, DIY cupboards, carpets, furniture, recreation grounds and even in our medicines and bathroom cabinets.


Organochlorines
Organochlorine (OC) pesticides are based on the benzene ring with one or more chloride atoms attached. They include DDT, lindane, dieldrin and aldrin. OCs act on neuronal membrane, interfering with the permeability gradients involving the passage of sodium and potassium ions. Acute poisoning in humans causes dizziness, nausea, twitching of arms and legs, tremors and convulsions, and finally cessation of breathing (2).

OCs are particularly harmful for all living systems, owing to their high affinity to fatty tissue, and to their persistence in the environment. Their half-lives have been found to be at least 20 years in both soil and water, with some soils retaining as much as 38% of the amount originally applied (1,2,11). Because of their solubility in fats, this group of pesticides can accumulate and transfer from one food chain to another, e.g. from insects to birds, to fish, and thence to larger mammals, including humans (12). This accumulative danger of OC pesticides led to their environmental ban in 1971 in the US. In the UK, they became subject to a voluntary ban from 1974 onwards. However, lindane (gamma HCH) is still widely used in the UK as an agricultural and horticultural insecticide, as a wood preservative, and as a treatment for head lice and scabies. Despite restrictions on their use, residues are still frequently found in many food products. After being banned, environmental levels of OC residues fell until the 1980s, since when they have remained fairly static. This has been attributed to the ever-increasing use of OC compounds for industrial purposes, as well as to their continued legal and possibly illegal use (1,2). A 1979-1980 analysis of 22 dietary samples found high levels of dieldrin in some milk and potato samples, as well as lindane in some meat, milk and poultry. While the average level in the group of samples were low, in some they still exceeded the current EC recommended Maximum Residue Level (MRL) (13). Other samples taken in 1985-1987 of strawberries, brussel sprouts and cabbages revealed that DDT levels exceeded the MRL recommendations (2). Other surveys have found dioxin and other OC residues in fruit, vegetable, meat and dairy products sampled (14-16).

Persistent OC residues such as DDT, which is highly fat soluble, have been found in fat tissue of all humans tested. Government figures show that in 1977 the average DDT contamination in men was 2.6 ppm (parts per million) and in women 1.6 ppm, thus exceeding the current official EC MRL. In some men the DDT levels were found to exceed 15 times the EC legal limit, and in some women 17 times over the limit (17). Furthermore, traces of lindane and dieldrin were detected in 1979/80 UK survey in human milk samples (2). The presence of pesticide levels in human milk samples is apparently still quite common, particularly in developing countries. For example, high levels of aldrin have been recorded in human milk samples in India, while dieldrin levels have been found to be the highest in the breast milk in most South American countries (18). In addition, some infant foods have been found to be contaminated with pesticides. A 1987 Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) survey on 50 infant foods detected that 18 out of 31 samples of infant rusks contained pirimiphos methyl and three samples of cow's milk contained dieldrin at levels exceeding the EC MRL (12). These findings are alarming, as they show that exposure to pesticides can begin very early in human life, and particularly because DDT, dieldrin and aldrin have all been found to have carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic action (2,19).

Latest evidence also suggests that OC pesticides have mild oestrogenic properties and may thus able to precipitate labour. Studies in Brazil and in India have shown the levels of DDT to be significantly higher both in miscarried fetuses and in pre-term infants compared to infants born full-term (20,21). Recent research has suggested that an excessive exposure to OCs may be a cause for the presently appreciable decline in sperm density and quality, which is reflected in an overall reduction in male fertility (22,23).

Even though lindane is considered to be slightly less toxic than other DDT-related products, it is still able to dissolve in water to form two toxic compounds, i.e. alpha- and beta- HCH (1). A recent study on marine environment has clearly demonstrated a relatively high level of lindane metabolites in marine environment (24). Lindane has been directly linked with both reproductive and carcinogenic properties (19).

Organophosphates

From the mid-1970s, when the persistent OCs were finally phased out of the agricultural market, they were replaced by highly toxic, but biodegradable, organophosphorus and carbarmate pesticides. Their toxic pedigree was established during World War II, when research was conducted to find potent nerve gases for military purposes. Virtually all types of organopesticides (OPs) target and depress acetylcholinesterase activity in a dose-dependent manner, leading to an excessive acetylcholine output, nerve paralysis and finally death. The acetylcholinesterase inhibition is non-specific, affecting the whole body systems via the cholinergic, muscarinic and nicotinic receptor pathways. The body systems affected are the central nervous system, the autonomic nervous system, as well as peripheral muscular pathways (2,25,26).

Adverse Effects of Pesticides

The London Food Commission conducted a thorough toxicological survey on active ingredients currently permitted for use by UK pesticide manufacturers. The results showed that out of 426 chemicals listed, 68 were found to be carcinogenic, 61 mutagenic and 35 were found to have various reproductive effects, ranging from impotency to a variety of birth defects. Furthermore, 93 were found to cause skin irritations and similar milder complications. In total, almost 40% of pesticides currently in use were linked with at least one adverse effect (19).

Acute exposure:
Most of the evidence on the acute health effects of pesticides exposure worldwide relates to accidental occupational poisoning. In 1986, a World Health Organisation (WHO) report estimated that there were between 800,000 and 1,500,000 cases of unintentional pesticide poisoning worldwide, leading to between 3000 and 28,000 deaths. This figure of accidental poisoning included a spectrum of conditions, from a minor skin and eye irritations to extremely severe systemic effects. The figures for deaths were fairly rough estimates, based only on records of the few countries where pesticide poisoning is officially recognised and/or recorded (1,27).

Chronic exposure:
Given today's extensive use of pesticides, it is almost impossible for any one to avoid daily exposure to low levels of several different pesticides residues. Consequently, there is now concern about possible adverse effects on human health arising from continual long-term, low-level pesticide exposure. There is particular concern regarding possible carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, neurobehavioural and neurotoxic effects, and allergic and other immunoregulatory disorders (1,2).


Carcinogenity

Numerous studies have found a high incidence of cancers and related disorders in individuals occupationally exposed to pesticides (28-38). These include lung (39,40), kidney (41), and testicular cancers (42), leukaemias and multiple myelomas (43-49), mesenchymal and other tumours (50-52), non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and malignant lymphomas (53-58), soft-tissue sarcomas (59-61) and brain gliomas (62,63). The most common pesticides which have been found to be carcinogenic include, aldrin, benomyl, captafol, captan, lindane, 2,4-D, maneb, mancozeb, thiram and zineb (2,19). It has also been suggested that a chronic low-level exposure to any carcinogenic substances, including pesticides, from early infancy may lead to cancer formation later in life. The pesticides listed in this study were; captan, chlorothaoil, folpet, ethylene thiourea, acephate, parathion and methyl parathion (64).

Reproductive Effects

The London Food Commission has listed 35 different pesticides that have been linked with adverse reproductive effects in animal studies. The findings include such widely used formulations as; aldrin, benomyl, captan, carbaryl, dieldrin, dinoseb, ioxynil, lindane, maneb and paraquat (19).

Mutagenicity:
Chronic exposure to pesticides has been linked with mutagenic activity in both animal and human studies (65-79). The most commonly used pesticides which have been found to possess particularly mutagenic properties include; benomyl, captan, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, cyanazine, dichlorofluranid, dimenthoate, omethoate, paraquat, simazine, 2,4,5-T and thiram (2,19). The mutagenic effects of pesticides became particularly noticeable when it was found that infants born to the US servicemen, who were exposed during the Vietnam war to a defoliant called Agent Orange (2,4,5-T, mixed with dioxins), were found to have an extremely high overall rate of birth defects, including neural tube and facial clefts. Also, high rates of miscarriages and stillbirths were found among the partners of these men (80-82). Other studies have reported greater numbers of spina bifida, anencephaly, and facial clefts in the offspring born to fathers whose job title suggests exposure to agricultural chemicals, when compared to other occupations (83).

Teratogenity:
Chronic exposure to pesticides has also been linked with teratogenic action in both animal and human studies (84-89). The most commonly used pesticides linked with teratogenicity are; aldrin, benomyl, captan, captafol, 2,4,5-T, dichlorvos and diazinon (2,19). Several studies have found higher numbers of various congenital malformations occurring in the offspring born to pesticide exposed parents, including cleft lip and/or palate (90), hydrocephaly (91), various congenital long bone and limb defects (92), anopthalmia (93), as well as considerably higher miscarriage and stillbirth rates (94). Retrospective studies found a high rate of stillbirths and a significant increase in congenital malformations of the neural tube and the palate in children born to Vietnamese civilians in a period coinciding with the two years of heavy spraying of pesticides (95).


Neurotoxic and Neurobehavioural Effects

The anticholinesterase activity of organophosphates (OPs) results in an excess of acetylcholine activity, primarily in the muscarinic receptors (96). Chronic exposure to OPs has been found to result in a gradual loss of brain stem cholinergic muscarinic and nicotinic (97-101) and serotonergic (102,103) receptors, as well as to an increased permeability of blood-brain barrier (104). It has been now established, through animal experiments, that perinatal exposure to OPs can cause negativre neurobehavioural effects in the offspring. For example, rats exposed to OPs gavre birth to pups with an impairment in endurance and coordination, as well as a reduction in the number of brain neurotransmitter receptor sites. It was concluded that OPs can act as neurobehavioural teratogens, causing behavioural abnormalities in the offspring without any other outwardly noticeable effects (105,106). Chronic post-natal exposure to OPs has also been linked with other psychiatric manifestations, such as long-term changes in brain function when measured by the electroencephalogram (107), aggression (108), memory difficulties, depression, emotional instability and schizophrenic reactions (109-111).

Delayed Neurotoxicity

Several cases of organophosphate induced delayed polyneurophathy have been reported in the literature (112- 120), in some instances affecting thousands of individuals (121). In addition, sclerosis of myelinated axons, in which demyelination is a secondary response to axonal degeneration, has consistently been associated with OP-induced delayed neurotoxicity (25,122,123). Consequently, several aetiological correlations have been made between those occupationally exposed to OPs and the development of multiple sclerosis (25,124-126), Motor neurone and Parkinson's disease (25,127,128), muscular dystrophy (25,130,131), Wernicke's encephalopathy (25,129) and Guillan Barre-like syndromes (25,130).

Allergies and Other Immuno-Regulatory Disorders

In humans, chronic OP exposure is able to disrupt serotogenically mediated immunoregulation (25), leading to a a prolonged suppression of T-lymphocytes and an elevation of B-lymphocytes (25,131-133). Interleukin 2 and natural killer cell activity also seem to be affected (25,134,135). Consequently, chronic OP exposure has been linked with the development of allergies and other immunoregulatory disorders, such as chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis. (25,136-138).

Pesticides in the Environment

Food:
The 1985-1988 report by the MAFF Working Party on Pesticide Residues found that the most commonly detected pesticide residues in animal meat were pp'DDE, a metabolite of DDT, and gamma-HCH (lindane). They were found most frequently in lamb, and the explanation was thought to be the use of DDT and HCH in sheep dips (12). The 1982-1986 survey on vegetables and fruit found that 37 out of 67 samples of potatoes analyzed contained residues of tecnazene in the excess of EC recommended MRL (12). Tecnazene and other pesticides are widely used post-harvest during storage of potatoes and other vegetable, fruit and grain crops for the prevention of various storage diseases. As a consequence pure bran, because its position outside the grain, has been found to be contaminated with pesticides at levels of three to four times higher than of the whole grain. Similar results have been found among apple and pear crops, of which approximately 80% are held in long-term storage before distribution (139,140). The latest official survey has shown that onethird of all fruit and vegetables sold in the UK are now contaminated with pesticide residues, some exceeding the recommended EC MRL. The pesticide residues found in the samples contained, among others, also fungicides such as zineb and mancozeb, both of which are known to be carcinogenic (141). Similar findings were found by another survey. For example, out of 23 different fruits sampled, 14 were found to contain pesticide residues, and of 34 vegetables sampled, 18 were found to be contaminated. The number of pesticides reported in any one sample varied from one to seven. Taking account of all fruit and vegetables sampled, one-third of them were found to be contaminated with pesticides (1,12,142).

Water:
A recent survey conducted on drinking water quality identified that 298 water supplies in the UK were found to be contaminated with pesticides, of which 76 were found to exceed the Maximum Admissible Concentration (MAC) of pesticide residues. Sixteen different active pesticide ingredients were detected, of which atrazine, simazine, 2,4-D and 2,3,4-T were found to exceed the MAC (143). Also lindane, mecocrop and dimethoate have been detected in some surface and ground water sources, particularly in intensive and arable agricultural areas (142}. Other nondegradable industrial chemicals such as chloroform, trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, DDT, lead, cadmium, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), titanium oxides etc., have been detected in the surface, ground, and drinking water sources (1}.

Besides pesticides and other industrial pollutants, nitrates are also widely detected in UK drinking water supplies. This is due to ever-increasing amounts of nitrogenbased fertilizers being added to the soil. In the late 1930s 60,000 tonnes of nitrogen fertilizers were spread on agricultural land in UK each year, increasing to 1,580,000 tonnes by 1985 (144). Only about half of the fertilizers applied is taken up by the crop, the other half being lost in a variety of ways, e.g. by denitrification into the atmospnere, by combining into the soil's organic matter and by leaching into surface or ground water reservoirs (145,146). As the result of nitrates leaching to the water supply, it is estimated that at present approximately 1,000,000 people in UK are exposed to nitrate levels in drinking water exceeding the present MAC level and, if no action is taken, this figure will rise by the early part of the next century to an estimated of 4,600,000 individuals (147). High nitrite, derived from high nitrate, has been linked with the 'blue baby' syndrome due to methaemoglobinaemia. The N-nitroso group are considered to be among the most powerful chemical carcinogens and have been found to cause cancer in 39 animal species studied, including primates (19,148-151).

Nitrogen is a vital element found in all plant, soil, air, water and arumal pathways. The crucial questions is, however, whether indiscriminate use of inorganic nitrogen in agriculture is either necessary or appropriate, as it has already caused a widespread eutrophication in most UK waterways, leading to the suffocation and death of several river, lake and marine species (19). The use of nitrogen fertilizers also affects the nutritional value of crops, as farmers are able to grow, with the help of the fertilizers, an abundance of green foliage, practically devoid of essential trace elements (152,153). Recent crop and soil investigations found particularly low levels of manganese, zinc and iron in the samples studied (154-156). Manganese deficiency has been linked with a wide range of metabolic defects, including congenital malformations (157). Zinc deficiency in turn can lead to premature delivery, small for gestational age babies and/or congenital malformations (158).

Testing the Toxicity of Pesticides

Most current research into the toxicity of pesticides uses tests of a single compound LD (lethal dose) on animals (143). However, unlike these test conditions the general human population is exposed intermittently to a great combination of pesticide residues daily for many years at very low doses. The outcome of this type of longterm, chronic exposure is quite impossible to determine using animal experiments (159). Furthermore, animal tests, when clearly positive, could be a complete waste of time, as humans do not necessarily respond to substances in the same way as animals do, and vice versa. For example, 2-napthylamine has been found to be a bladder carcinogen in humans and dogs, but not in mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits (160). Morphine excites cats, but is used as an anaesthetic in humans. Arsenic kills humans, but is harmless to guinea pigs, chickens and monkeys. Digitalis raises blood pressure in dogs, but lowers it in humans (161). The other factor which must be taken into account is the synergistic effect of pesticides, which may lead to increased toxicity. For example, studies have found that when the fungicide perchloraz was given to birds along with the insecticide malathion, there was a dramatic increase in bird deaths over that expected from the same dose of each pesticide given alone. Similar interactions have been also found to occur between dimethoate and chlorpyrifos with perchloraz (162). This phenomenon was indeed noticed by the the Government Steering Group on Food Surveillance, as they state: "At present toxicological interpretation is particularly difficult where residues of more than one pesticide is found in the same food sample" (12). A similar point has been expressed by WHO about the mixture of pesticides currently found in the drinking water samples. They observed that "the problem of exposure to any mixture of two or more herbicides cannot be handled in isolation. Drinking water may contain chemical residues of different types, including pesticides and other contaminants. In addition, people are exposed to chemical substances by many other routes, which may give rise to possible interactions" (163).

Problems of Resistance and Persistence

In 1986 Goldsmith and Hildyard produced a report which commented critically on the level of current pesticide production and use in the UK agricultural market. They write: "In three years, between 1974 and 1977, the area of cereals sprayed with aphicides increased 19 times. Between 1979 and 1982, the area of crops treated with insecticides has doubled, while the area treated with fungicides more than doubled. BAA figures from 1979 and 1982 for the major crops grown in Britain (cereals, potatoes, oilseed rape, sugar beet and peas) has shown a 29% increase in the area sprayed with herbicides, a 39% increase for insecticides and a 106% increase in fungicides. Yet the actual cropped area only increased four per cent " (164). One explanation for this discrepancy could be the increasing number of pesticide-resistant pests (165). The first reports of herbicide resistance appeared as long as 1969, since when numerous reports have appeared (166,167). Currently, 50 different herbicide-resistant weed species (166,168) have been identified, while the number of insecticide-resistant insects is also growing at an alarming rate (169). As a consequence, the agrochemical industry is busily developing new chemicals, designed to destroy a narrower and narrower range of target species. A resulting problem, however, is that many of these agrochemicals do not decay in the soil, as it had been first predicted. For example, the 1987 British Geological Survey (BSG) on the Pollution of Agriculture Pesticides and Solvents found that the assumption that agrochemicals decay quickly in the soil, or simply evaporate, is no longer valid. Although some compounds are rapidly hydrolysed in water, others break down very slowly and thus can percolate swiftly into aquifiers, particularly through sandy or chalky soils (170). When these chemicals penetrate ground-water supplies, pollution can affect the same supply for years to come (171). Among the most widely spread and most problematic pesticides are some herbicides, especially the carboxyacid and phenylurea groups, as well as chlorinated solvents (170).


Recommendations

Excessive food production among the EC countries is a very real problem. Millions of pounds of fruit and vegetables are destroyed, distilled to alcohol or fed to animals each month. For example, during a period of 4 months, 605,518 tonnes of apples, 285,702 tonnes of peaches and 164,357 tonnes of oranges were destroyed at the staggering cost of £67,000,000 (172). The tax-payer is effectively paying three times for this fiasco: by subsidising surplus and unwanted agricultural production, by paying to clean up resultant pollution, and by paying for the medication needed to treat health problems associated with agrochemicals. The irony here is that the companies which manufacture the toxic agrochemicals are very often those who also manufacture the medication. The following recommendations are made with a view to improve the current situation:

1) The responsibility for administering and enforcing pesticide Iegislation is currently split in the LIK between two government agencies; the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF), the latter being also responsible for food production. The role of MAFF both in pesticide regulation and food production must involve a conflict of interests. Therefore, the responsibility for pesticide enforcement should be handed over entirely to the HSE and/or to some other regulatory body such the Environmental Protection Agency.

2) Freedom of information is required by the general public covering all effects of pesticides, toxic or otherwise. Under the current UK law, pesticide manufacturers are only required to provide sufficient information to satisfy official committees composed of various experts. The same data should also be easily accessible to the general public. There is no doubt that the present crises in UK pesticide policy has so far escaped a radical overhaul only through the power of secrecy.

3) The current UK law covering food labelling should be amended to include all pesticides used, particularly if the product has received post-harvest treatments.

4) Great efforts should be made in the reduction of pesticide use, and the development of chemical free alternatives. Conversion to organic farming can be a long-term exercise, involving a complete restructuring of farming practices, which may take several years to achieve. However, that must be the ultimate aim. The present policy of set-aside, which pays farmers to take land out of production, could be used more advantageously. Instead of this land going to non-farming uses, farmers could be paid to farm the same land less intensively. The current argument seems not to be that organic methods do not work, but that they are not competitive enough. However, organic farmers have long claimed that they are able to achieve crop yields that are close to, or even equivalent, to those achieved by systems involving agrochemicals. A fairly recent report of the US National Academy of Sciences has been able to support these findings. The study monitored 14 successful organic farms over a 5-year period. One of the farms, which had not used agrochemicals for 15 years, had corn yields 32% higher and soya bean yields 40% higher when compared to another local farm using agrochemicals (173). Another study found that cutting herbicide applications by 87% had not reduced yields of either wheat or barley (2,174).

Conclusion

Current agricultural policy benefits only a small number of corporate farmers and the agrochemical companies. Far more consideration should now be given to the small, independent farmer and to the consumer. Few areas of government policy is so intimately concerned with individual consumers as are the provision of safe nutritious food to eat and clean water to drink. In order to start to reduce present high-level agrochemical use and contamination, government policy should be to motivate farmers to adopt effective integrated pest management strategies, which combine traditional farming methods, such as crop rotation, fallowing, manual feeding, etc., with artificial pest controls. Furthermore, full financial support should be available to any farmer wishing to adapt to organic farming practices.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

This study was supported by as grant from FORESIGHT, The Association for the Promotion of Preconceptual Care. A special recognition is given to Mrs Belinda Barnes who has fought tirelessly to draw attention to the harmful effects of agrochemicals on reproduction and health.



References:
1. The BMA Guide to Pesticides, Chemicals and Health. Edward Arnold, 1992.

2. Robbins C: Poisoned Harvest: A Consumers Guide to Pesticide use and Abuse Victor Gollancz Ltd, pp 300-313, 1991.

3. British Agrochemicals Association, Annual Report and Handbook, Peterborough: BAA, 1988/89.

4. Country NatWest WoodMac, in: World Crop Protection Prospects: Demisting the Crystal Ball. The Bawden Memorial Lacture, Brighton Crop Protection Conference, 1988.

5. Watterson A: Pesticide User's Health and Safety Handbook: An International Guide, Gower Techical Press, 1989.

6. MAFF: Research Consultative Committee, Residues Sub-Group Report, London, 1989

7. Toxic Treatments: Wood Preservative Hazards at Work and in the Home. London Hazards Centre, 1989.

8. Provisional Code of Practice for the Use of Pesticides in Forestry. Farnham, Forestry Commission, 1989.

9. Rosanove R: Dangers of the application of lanolin. Med J Austr, 46:232 1987.

10. Copeland C et al: Pesticide residues in lanolin (letter) JAMA, 261:242 1989.

11. Bhantnagar P and Kumas S: Update and bioconcentration of dieldrin, dimethoate and permethrin by Tetrahymena pyriformis, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 40:345-9, 1989.

12. MAFF: Report of Working Party on Pesticide Residues: Food Surveillance Paper,l982-86 (fruit and vegetables}, 1985-88 (animal products), 1987 (infant foods) HMSO, 1989.

13. WPRR Report of the Working Party on Pesticide Residues, London, 1988-9.

14. Hall RH: A new threat to public health: organochlorines and food, Nutrition and Health, 8:33-43, 1992.

15. Gartrell MJ et al: Pesticides, selected elements and other chemicals in adult total diet samples, October 1980-March 1982. J Ass Official Analytical Chemists, 69:146-159, 1986,

16. Davies KS: Concentrations and dietary intake of selected organochlorides including PCB's, PCDD's, and PCDF's in fresh food composites grown in Ontario, Candada Cemosphere, 17:263-276, 1988.

17. MAFF Working Party on Pesticide Residues (1977-81). The ninth report of the Steering Group on Food Surveillance. London HMSO, 1982.

18. Jensen AA: Chemical contamination in human milk. Residue Review, 89:1-128, 1983.

19. The London Food Commission: Food Adulteration and How to Beat it. Unwin Paperbacks, 1988.

20. Procianoy RS: Blood pesticide concentrations in mothers and their new born infants. Acta Paediatrica Scand, 700:925-8, 1981.

21. Saxena MC et al: Organochlorine pesticides in specimens of women undergoing spontaneous abortion, premature or full delivery. J Anal Toxicology, 5:6-9, 1981.

22. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE: Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. Br Med J, 305: 609-13, 1992.

23. Editorial: Male reproductive health and environmental oestrogens. Lancet, 345:933-35, 1995

24. Water Exchange and Pollution in the North Sea. Hamburg, University of Hamburg, 1989.

25. Purdey M: Are organophosphate pesticides involved in the causation of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)? Hypothesis based upon a literary review and limited trials on BSE cattle. J Nutr Med, 4:43-82, 1994.

26. Hassal KA: The Chemistry of Pesticides. Methuen, 1982.

27. World Health Organisation, Public health impact on pesticides used in agriculture. Geneva, WHO, 1990.

28. Burmeister LF: Cancer mortality in Iowa farmers, 1971-8. J Nat Cancer Inst, 66:461-4, 1981.

29. Burmeister LF et al: Selected cancer mortality and farm practices in Iowa. Am J Epidemiology, 118:72-7, 1983.

30. Buesching D and Wollstadt L: Cancer mortality among farmers. J Epidem and Community Health, 38:113-6, 1984.

31. Gallagher RP et al: Cancer and plastic anaemia in British Columbia farmers. J Nat Cancer Inst, 72:1311-15, 1984.

32. Barthel E: Retrospective cohort study on cancer frequency in pesticide exposed male pest-control workers. Zeitschrift fur Erkangfungen der Atmung Sorgane, 166:62-8, 1986.

33. Editorial: Herbicide exposure and cancer. JAMA, 256:1176-7, 1986.

34. Sharp DS et al: Delayed health hazards of pesticide exposure. Ann Review of Public Health, 7:441-71, 1986.

35. Saftlas AF: Cancer and ocher causes of death among Wisconsin farmex Am J Indust Med, 11:119-29, 1987.

36. Cancer risk in agricultural workers: AMA Council on Scientific Affairs Report JAMA, 260:959-66, 1988.

37. Corrao G et al: Cancer risk in a cohort of licenced pesticide users. Scand J of Work, Envir and Health, 15:203-9, 1989.

38. Wiklund K et al: Risk of cancer in pesticide applicators in Swedish agriculture. Br J Indust Med, 46:809-14, 1989.

39. Barthei E: Increased risk of lung cancer in pesticide exposed male agricultural workers. J of Toxicology and Environ Health, 8:1027-40, 1981.

40. Blair A et al: Lung cancer and other causes of death among licenced pesticide applicators. J Nat Cancer Inst, 256:1176-8, 1983.

41. Agent Orange Program: Mortality Among Vietnam Veterans in Massachusetts, 1972-83. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1985.

42. Wiklund K et al: Testicular cancer among agricuitural workers and licenced pesticide applicators in Sweden. Seand J Work Environ and Health, 12:630-l, 1986.

43. Milham S: Leukemia and multiple myeloma in farmers. Am J Epidem, 94:307-10, 1971.

44. Blair A and Thomas TL: Leukemia among Nebraska farmers: A death certificate study. Am J Epidem, 110:264-73, 1979.

45. Burmeister LF et al: Leukemia and farm practices in Iowa. Am J Epidem, 115:720-8, 1982.

46. Agu VU et al: Geographical patterns of multiple myeloma. J Nat Cancer Inst, 65:735-8, 1980.

47. Cantor KP and Blair A: Farming and mortality from multiple myeloma: a case control study with the use of death certificates. J Nat Cancer Inst, 72:251-5, 1984.

48. Steineck G and Wiklund K: Multiple myelomas in Swedish agricultural workers. Int J Epidem, 128:778-85, 1986.

49. Cuzick J and de Stavola B: Multiple myeloma - a case study. Br J Cancer, 57:616-20, 1988.

50. Hardell L: Malignant mesenchymal tumours and exposure to phenoxy acids: a clinical observation. Lakartidningen, 74:2553-4, 1977.

51. Axelson O and Sundell L: Herbicide exposure and tumor incidence: an epidemiological investigation on Swedish raiiroad workers. Work, Environ and Health, 11:21-8, 1974.

52. Axelson O et al: Herbicide exposure and tumour mortality an updated epidemiologic investigation on Swedish railroad workers. Scand J Work, Environ and Health, 6:73-9, 1980.

53. Olsson H and Brandt L: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the skin and occupational exposure to herbicides. Lancet, ii: 579 1981.

54. Cantor KP: Farming and mortality from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case control study. .nt J Cancer, 19:239-47, 1982.

55. Pearce NE et al: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and exposure to phenoxy herbicides , charophenols, sensing work and meat work employment. Br J Indust Med, 44:75-83, 1986.

56. Pearce NE et al: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and farming: an expanded case control study. Int J Cancer, 39:155-61, 1987.

57. Hardell L et al: Malignant lymphomas and exposure to chemicals especially organic solvents, chlorophenols, and phenoxy acids. Br J Cancer, 43:169-76, 1981.

58. Dubrow R et al: Farming and malignant lymphoma in Hancock County, Ohio. Br J Indust Med, 45:25-8, 1988.

59. Hardell L and Sandstrom A: Case control study: soft tissue sarcomas and exposure to phenoxyacetic acids or chlorophenols. Br J Cancer, 39:711-17, 1979.

60. Hay A: Phenoxy herbicides, trichlorophenols and soft tissue sarcomas. Lancet, i:1240 1982.

61. Hoar S et al: Agricultural herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma. JAMA, 256:1141-7, 1986.

62. Musicco M et al: Gliomas and occupational exposure to carcinogens: a case control study J Occup Med, 26:906-8, 1982.

63. Musicco M et al: A case control study of brain gliomas and occupational exposure to chemical carcinogens: the risk to farmers. Am J Epidem, 128:778-85, 1988.

64. Natural Resources Defence Council: Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in our Children's Food. Washington; DC: NRDC, 1989.

65. Epstein SS et al: Mutagenicity of trimethylphosphate in mice. Science, 168:584-6, 1970.

66. Dean BJ: The mutagenic effects of organophosphorus pesticides on micro organisms. Arch Toxicol, 30:67-74, 1972.

67. Fahring R: Mutagenicity studies on pesticides. In: Chemical Carcinogesis Assays, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Scientific Publication 10, 1974.

68. Wild D: Mutagenicity studies on organophosphorus insecticides. Mutation Res, 32:133-150, 1975.

69. Shirasu Y et al: Mutagenicity screening of pesticides in the microbial system. Mutation Res, 40:19-30, 1976.

70. Pool DC et al: In vitro mutagenic activity of fourteen pesticides. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 41:196 1977.

71. Carere A et al: Microbiological mutagenicity studies on pesticides in vitro. Mutation Res, 57:277-286, 1978.

72. Simmons VF: In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity assay of selected pesticides. In: A Rational Evaluation of Pesticidal vs. Mutagenicity/Carcinogenic Action. Eds: EW Hart, MF Kroybill, FJ De Serres, DHEV Publ. No:(NIH) 78-1306, 1978, pp 27-71.

73. Waters MD et al: On overview of short term tests for mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of pesticides. J Environ Sci Health, 15:867-906, 1980.

74. Sobti RC et al: Cytokinetic and cytogenic effects of some agricultural chemicals in human lymphoid cells in vitro: organophosphates. Mutation Res, 102:89-102, 1982.

75. Shaw MW: Human chromosome damage by chemical agents. Ann Rev Med, 21:409-432, 1970.

76. Van Bao R et al: Chromosome aberrations in patients suffering from acute phosphate insecticide intoxication. Humangenetik, 24:33-57, 1977.

77. Kiraly J et al: Chromosome studies in workers producing organophosphate insecticides. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 8:309-19, 1979.

78. Borden L and Primental T: Possible effects of dieldrin and other pesticides on human chromosomes in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Res Proj Directory, 5,11, 1980.

79. Walter Z et al: Effect of malathion on genetic material of human lymphocytes stimulated by phytohemagglutinin (PHA). Hum Genet, 53:375-381, 1980.

80. Hay A: Defoliants in Vietnam: the long-term effects. Nature, 302:208-9, 1983.

81. Lathorp G et al: An Epidaemiological investigation of Health Effects in Air Force Personnel Following Exposure to Herbicides. Wasington, DC, Surgeon General, 1984

82. Hatch MC: Reproductive effects of the dioxins. In: Public Health Risks of the Dioxins. Ed. W Lowrance pp 255-274, Los Altos, Kaufmann, 1984.

83. Balarajan R and McDowall M: Congenital malformations and agricultural workers. Lancet, i:1112-3, 1983.

84. Kimbrough RD and Gaines TB: Effect of organic phosphorus compounds and alkylating agents on rat fetus. Arch Environ Health, 16:805-8, 1968.

85. Staples RE et al: Developmental toxicity in the rat after ingestion or gavage organophosphate pesticides (dipterex, imidan) during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect, 13:133-40, 1976.

86. Martson LV and Voronina VM: Experimental study on the effect of a series of phosphororganic pesticides (dipretex and imidan) on embryogenesis. Environ Health Perspect, 13:121-125, 1976.

87. Fishbein L: Teratonegic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of some organophosphate pesticides. In: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, Ed:CF Wilkinson, New York, Heyden, 1976.

88. Staples RE and Goulding EH: Dipterex teratogenicity in the rat, hamster and mouse when given by gavage. Environ Health Perspect, 30:105-113, 1979.

89. Gibson GT et al: Maternal exposure to environmental chemicals and the aetiology of teratogenesis. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaec, 23:170-4, 1983.

90. Gordon JE and Shy CM: Agricultural chemical use and congenital cleft lip and/or palate. Arch Environ Health, 36:213-221, 1981.

91. Galvan C et al: Diagnostic and etiological problems of hydroencephaly. Ann Esp Pediatr, 12:529-33, 1979.

92. Kricker A et al: Women and environment: a study of congenital limb anomalities. Commmunity Health Studies, 10:1-11, 1986.

93. Parents of boy without eyes sue American chemical giant. (A staff reporter) The Times, 6th December, 1994

94. Rita P et al: Monitoring of workers occupationally exposed to pesticides in grape gardens in Andhra Pradesh. Environ Res, 44:1-5, 1987.

95. Kunstadner PA: A Study of Herbicides and Birth Defects in the Republic of Vietnam. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 1982.

96. Taylor P: Anticholinesterase agents. Iit: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Eds: AG Goodman, et al. New York, Macmillan, 1980.

97. Dawson RM et al: Response of muscarinic cholinoreceptors of guinea pig brain and ileum to chronic administration of organophosphates and carbamates. Biochem Phatmacol, 30:2365-8, 1981.

98. Schwab BW et al: Reduced muscarihic receptor binding in tissues of rats tolerant to the insecticide disulfoton. Neurotoxicology, 2:635-48, 1981.

99. Costa LG et al: Differential alterations of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in acute and chronic tolerance to organophosphorus insecticides. Biochem Pharamacol, 31:3407-13, 1982.

100. McDonald BE et al: Spatial memory impairment and central muscarinic receptor loss following prolonged treatment with organphosphates. Toxicol Letter, 40:47-56, 1988.

101. Costa LG and Murphy SD: [3H]-nicotine binding in rat brain: Alteration after chronic acetylcholinesterase inhibition. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 226:392-7, 1983.

102. Prioux-Guyonneau M et al: Modification of rat brain 5HT metabolism by sublethal doses of organophosphate agents. Acta Pharmacol et Toxicol, 51:178-84, 1982.

103. Fernando JCR et al: A striatal seretonergic involvement in the behavioural effects of anti-cholinesterase organophosphates. Eur J Pharmacol, 98:129-32, 1984.

104. Dambska M et al: Blood brain barrier in young rabbit brain after dichlorvos intoxication. Neuropath Pol, 22:129-37, 1984.

105. Spyker JM and Avery DL: Neurobehavioural effects of prenatal exposure to organophosphate diazinon in mice. J Toxicol Environ Health, 3:982-1002, 1977.

106. Gufta RC et al: Brain cholinergic, behavioral, and morphological development in rats exposed in utero to methylparathion. Toxicol Appl Phamacol, 77:405-13, 1985.

107. Duffy FH and Burchfield JL: Long term effects of the organophosphate sarin on EEGs in monkeys and humans. Neurotoxicology, 1:667-689, 1980.

108. Bear D et al: Aggression in cat and human precipitated by a cholinesterase inhibitor. Psychosomatics, 27:535-6, 1986.

109. Gershon S and Shaw FH: Psychiatric sequelae of chronic exposure to organophosphorus insecticides. Lancet, i:1371-4, 1961.

110. Biskind MS and Mobbs RE: Psychiatric marufestations from insecticide exposure. JAMA, 220:1248 1972.

111. Bignami G et al: Behavioral toxicity of anticholinesterase agents: Methodologal neurochemical and neuropsychological aspects. In: Behavioral Toxicology, Eds: B Weiss and VG Laties pp I55-211, New York , Plenum, 1975.

112. Bidstrup PL et al: Paralysis following poisoning by a new organic phosphorus insecticide (mipafox): report of two cases. Br Med J, 1:1068 1953.

113. Johnson MK: The delayed neuropathy caused by some organophosphorus esters: inechanism and challenge. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol, 3:289 1975.

114. Hierons R and Johnson MK: Clinical and toxicological investigations of a case of delayed neuropathy in man after acute poisoning of organophosphorus pesticide. Arch Toxicol, 40:279 1978.

115. Xintaras C et al: Occupational exposure to leptophos and other chemicals. US Dept of Health, Education and Welfare, p78, NIOSH Publising, Goverment Printing Office, 1978.

116. Davis CS and Richardson RJ: Organophosphorus Compounds in: Experimental and Clinical Neurotoxicology. Eds: PS Spencer and HH Schaumburg, p527, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, London, 1980.

117. Jedrezojowska H et al: Neuropathy due to phytosol (Agritox): report of a case. Acta Neurophatol (Berl.). 49:163 1980.

118. Johnson MK: The target for initiation of delayed neurotoxicity by organophosphorus esters: biochemical studies and toxicological applications. Rev Biochem Toxicol, 4:141 1982.

119. Senanayake N and Johnson MK: Acute polyneuropathy after poisoning by a new organophosphate insecticide. New Engl J Med, 306:155 1982.

120. Lotti M: Lymphocytic Neurotoxic Esterase. In: Neurobehavioral Methods in Occupational Medicine. Advances in Biosciences, Vo1:46, Eds: R Gilioli et al. Pergamon Press, New York, 1983.

121. Smith HV and Spalding JMK: Outbreak of paralysis in Morocco due to orthocresyl phosphate poisoning. Lancet, ii:1019 1959.

122. Bouldin TW et al: Organophosphate neuropathy. Am J Pathol, 94:253-62, 1979.

123. Itoh H et al: Studies on delayed neurotoxicity of organophosphate compounds. Toxicol Sci, 9:37-50, 1984.

124. Flodin U et al: Multiple sclerosis, solvents and pesticides. Arch Neurol, 45:620-3, 1988.

125. Morton T: Sheep dip link with multiple sclerosis. The Shetland Times, June 24, 1988.

126. Blisard KS et al: Tlte investigation of a case of alleged insecticide toxicity: a case involving chlordane exposure, multiple sclerosis and peripheral neurophathy. J Forensic Sc JFSCA, 31:1499-1504, 1986.

127. Cavanagh JB: Organophosphate neurotoxicity: a model dying back process comparable to certain human neurological diseases. Guy's Hospital Reports, 112:303-19, 1963.

128. Jarvholm B et al: Exposure to Triarylphosphate and polyneurophathy. Am J Ind Med, 9:561-6, 1986.

129. De Reuck J: Fatal encephalopathy in acute poisoning with organophosphate insecticides. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 81:347-52, 1979.

130. Adlakha A et al: Guillan-Barre syndrome as a sequel of orhanophosphate poisoning. JAPI, 35:665-6, 1987

131. Katesenovich CA et al: T and B immunity systems in pesticide intoxication sufferers. Gigiena Truda Professionalye Zabolevania, 4:17-19, 1981.

132. Ahmed EH et al: Immunotoxicity of organophosphate compounds. Clin immun Immunopath, 49:41-52, 1988.

133. Newcombe DS et al: Immune surveillance, urganophosphate exposure and lymphomagnesis: Lancet, 339:539-41, 1992.

134. Pruett SB et al: Effects of paraoxon, p-nitrophenol, phenyl phosphate, phenol on the rat interleukin 2 system. Toxicol Letters, 40:11-20, 1988.

135. Steplewski Z et al: Changes in brain serotonin leves affect leucocytes, lymphocytes, T-cell subpopulations and natural killer cell activity in rats. Neurosci Lett, 62:277-82, 1985.

136. Behan P: Data presented at first international research conference on chronic fatigue syndrome. Albany, New York, 1992.

137. Shepherd C: Organophosphate pesticides - cause for concern? Practitioner, 237:212-14, 1993.

138. Jones D: The involvement of toxins, drugs and viruses in chronic fatigue syndrome. Paper presented at SMN conference, Borovetz, Bulgaria, Oetober, 1994.

139. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Research Consultative Committee, Residues Sub-Group Report, London, MAFF, 1989.

140. Home Grown Cereals Authority: The occurrenee and detection of pesticide residues in UK grain. London, HGCA, 1989

141. Nuttall N: Fruit and vegetables tainted with chemicals. The Times, 5th May, 1985.

142. Agriculture Committee of the House of Commons: The Effects of Pesticides in Human Health Vol:I, Report and Proceedings of the Committee, Vol:II Minutes of Evidence, VoI:III Appendices to Minutes of Evidence. Second Special Report. Session 1986-87, London:HMSO 1987.

143. Lees A and McVeigh K: An Investigation of Pesticide Pollution in Drinking Water in England and Wales. London, Friends of the Earth, 1988.

144. Holmes J: Nitrate or new dawn? Town and Country Planning, 56:131-2, 1987.

145. Hodges D: Agriculture, nitrates and health. Soil Assoc Quarterly Rev, September 16-18, 1985.

146. Royal Society: The Nitrogen Cycle of the United Kingdom London, Royal Society, 1983.

147. DOE Nitrate Coordination group: Nitrate and Water, Department of the Environmental Pollution Paper, No:26, HMSO, London, 1986.

148. Doll R and Peto R: The Causes of Cancer. Oxford Medical Publications, UK, 1981.

149. Dudley N: Nitrates in Food and Water. London Food Commission, London, 1986.

150. Taylor G: Nitrates, nitrites and cancer. Nutrition and Health, 2:1 1983.

151. Tannenbaum SR: N-nitroso compounds: a perspective in human exposure. Lancet, i:629-32, 1983.

152. Barnes B and Bradley SG: Planning for a Healthy Baby. Ebury Press, London, pp 122-134, 1990.

153. Pfeiffer CC: Mental and Elemental Nutrients. Keats Publishing, Inc, New Canaan, Connecticut, 1975.

154. Gopalan C: Food and Health -McCarrison Prescription Endures. Nutrition and Health, 8:1-16, 1992.

155. Sillanpaa M: FAO Soils Bulletin 48, Micronutrients and the nutrient status of soils: a global study. FAO, Rome, 1982.

156. Sillanpaa M: FAO Soils Bulletin 63, Micronutriex~ts assessment at the country level: an international study. FAO, Rome, 1990.

157. Utidjian HMD: The interaction between epidemiology and animal studies in industrial toxicology. In: Perspectives in Basic and Applied Toxicology. Ed: B Ballentyne, London: Wright , 1987.

158. Matsumura F: Toxicology of Pesticides. New York, Plenum, 1975.

159. Croce P: Vivisection or science - a choice to make. CIVIS Publicatios, POB 152, Via Motta 51, Lugano, Switzerland, pp 13-38, 1991.

160. Dawson AS: Interactive effects of pesticides with partridges. In: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Annual Report, Swindon:NERG, 1988/89.

161. World Health Organisation: Drinking Water Quality: Guidelines for Selected Herbicides. Environmental Health, No:27 , WHO, 1987.

162. Goldsmith E and Hildyard N (Eds): Green Britain or Industrial Wasteland? Cambridge: Polity, 1986.

163. Agricultural Science Service: Research & Development Report, 275(85), London, MAFF, 1985.

164. Gressel J: Evolution of weeds with multiple herbicide resistance: a new problem with dire consequences. Phytoparasitica, 16:364 1988.

165. Rubin B: Effect of monoculture on herbicide efficacy. Phytoparasitica, 16:359-60, 1988.

166. Dover M and Croft B: Getting Tough: Public Policy and the Management of Pesticide Resistance. Washington DC: World Resources Institute, 1984.

167. Metcalf RL: Insect resistance to insecticides. Pesticides Science, 26:333-58, 1989.

168. British Geological Survey: The Pollution Threat from Agricultural Pesticides and Industrial Solvents. London, BGS, 1987.

169. Graig F and Graig P: Britain's Poisoned Water. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1989.

170. Saner G et al: Hair manganese concentrations in newborns and their mothers. Am J Clin Nutr, 41:1042-44, 1985.

171. Tuormaa TE: The adverse effects of food additives on health with a special emphasis in childhood hyperactivity. J Orthomolecular Med, 9:225-243, 1994.

172. Tuormaa TE: An Alternative to Psychiatry. The Book Guild Ltd, pp 190-218, 1991.

173. National Academy of Sciences: Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: NAS, 1989.

174. Farmers Weekly, p 14, 6 April, 1990.



This paper is one of a series of booklets published by FORESIGHT, the Association for the Promotion of Pre-conceptual Care. The purpose of these documents is to make the great wealth of information that can be found in medical and other scientific journals available to prospective parents, health professionals or anyone else who does not have the time and/or the facilities to read them for themselves.

More:- Foresight Literature Summaries

Copyright © 2006 Foresight Association For The Promotion Of Pre-Conceptual Care Registered Charity No: 279160. All Rights Reserved